Article from helpingwritersbecomeauthors:
Excerpt from Jane Eyre
My ostensible errand on this occasion was to get measured for a pair of shoes; so I discharged that business first, and when it was done, I stepped across the clean and quiet little street from the shoemaker’s to the post-office: it was kept by an old dame, who wore horn spectacles on her nose, and black mittens on her hands.
“Are there any letters for J.E.?” I asked.
She peered at me over her spectacles, and then she opened a drawer and fumbled among its contents for a long time, so long that my hopes began to falter. At last, having held a document before her glasses for nearly five minutes, she presented it across the counter, accompanying the act by another inquisitive and mistrustful glance–it was for J.E.
Bringing Minor Characters to Life
In some ways, minor characters are like settings: they’re background “filler,” used to flesh out your story world and provide interactions for your protagonist. However, wielded with a deft hand, minor characters offer the possibility of being so much more. As we’ve already discussed in Chapter 6, they can be a mirror in which the protagonist compares and contrasts her own strengths and weaknesses. But they can also provide everything from comic relief to conflict to communication. A minor character can appear throughout the story, as does Rochester, or only once, a does our unnamed post lady in this scene.
Whatever the importance or length of their roles, minor characters should never be taken for granted. If you’re going to raise your story into a convincing facsimile of realism and, as a result, suspend your readers’ disbelief, every minor character needs to be treated just a seriously as the protagonist. Brontë’s postal lady appears only once. She is given a grand total of five paragraphs and one line of dialogue and isn’t even introduced by name. Brontë tells readers just three things about her: she’s old, she wears glasses, and she wears mittens. But these details are more than enough to give readers the paints they need to finish the character’s portrait. Let’s take a closer look at how Brontë accomplished this:
1. The length of the description indicates the character’s role in the story.
A more prominent character would deserve a much more complete description, but any more than we find here would have given readers an incorrect sense of the postal lady’s importance within the story.
2. The details are vivid and specific.
The old woman’s spectacles are “horn” and her mittens are “black.” Because textures and colors immediately establish visual images in the readers’ imagination, they can be extremely efficient adjectives
3. The “rule of three” achieves a sense of balance.
The human brain, whether through inherent tendency or just ingrained association, finds a sense of wholeness in lists of three. The result is a catalog of details that presents a rounded picture without lapsing into a “grocery list.”
4. The readers are trusted to fill in the blanks.
Say “apple,” and readers see a shiny red apple with a green leaf and a friendly worm. Say “nerd,” and they see a guy in black glasses and a loaded pocket protector. Readers don’t need much to be able to visualize a character. Less description is often more.
5. The character acts uniquely and realistically.
When the old woman peers and fumbles, and then stares at the letter for five minutes before “suspiciously” handing it over, she becomes a personage in her own right. She’s the heroine of her own story, whatever it may be, and she acts like it.
This is good advice because it's basic and simple. I have found that if writing about writing is too exacting , it can kill the writing.
BeantwoordenVerwijderenIt's the difference between seeing a butterfly floating in a field or seeing one pinned onto a board.
You want the live butterfly .
When I read that passage of the postmistress, I can't help feeling it's an older version of CB interacting with a young one ( as JE) . She has CB's glasses,mittens and the up close reading...plus the mistrustful glance! lol
One of the best books on Jane Eyre I have found is
" Mysteries of Love " by Elizabeth Imlay
I realized I should post the book's full name as it has important words in it. It's called
BeantwoordenVerwijderen" Charlotte Bronte and the Mysteries of Love: Myth and Allegory in "Jane Eyre"
Myth and Allegory being the extra important part.
Ms. Imlay's proves to my mind Jane Eyre was no subconscious out pouring. But a closely crafted book by a amazingly deliberate artist who used age old means and methods to plot out her book . These Myth and Allegories were well known to the educated 19th cent reader...but are mostly lost to us. Imlay restores them .
She also closely studies the magazines the Brontes read, such as Frasers etc.. It's important to know what they read in order to fully appreciate what they wrote