Hathaways of Haworth thinks the answer is a very clear no, based on overwhelming evidence from her day to day interactions .The suggestion is usually put forward by people who have read standard biographies or accounts by strangers about Emily’s public behaviour. I realise the subjects complex and I am only covering popularly perceived traits in both those with Asperger’s and those with other forms of Autism .However its usually these specific traits which are signalled out in Emily to support the theory she had some form of Autism. I think a superficial examination is however enough to disprove the idea.
The main reason.
Emily is an emotionally normal child possibly even a overly friendly one whereas Autistic children often present with problems quite quickly autism
Emily is an affectionate and sweet natured child with a character open and trusting enough to be able to endear strangers to her quite quickly. Emily was very clearly an endearing child and good around strangers while as she gets older her behaviour becomes more eccentric and reclusive ocialy, showing “learned” antisocial traits rather than core character traits. While there isn’t a huge number of accounts of Emilys early childhood, the ones that survive most notably from Cowen Bridge talks about her being seen as "a sweet little thing”. Miss Evans, the superintendent of the new school, called Brontë a “darling child” and “little petted Em” and the admissions register referred to her as “quite the pet nursling of the school.” Who doesn’t seem to have had trouble adapting to a different routine and one that was extremely rigid and in almost all respects different to her home life. Nor at this time does she seem to be having any problems interacting with strangers. Autistic children show problems with change and social interactions quite quickly. The negative responses to change and social environments is progressive but variable. It seems that as she gets older she gets less able to or willing to adjust.
Read more on: Hathaways of Haworth
The main reason.
Emily is an emotionally normal child possibly even a overly friendly one whereas Autistic children often present with problems quite quickly autism
Emily is an affectionate and sweet natured child with a character open and trusting enough to be able to endear strangers to her quite quickly. Emily was very clearly an endearing child and good around strangers while as she gets older her behaviour becomes more eccentric and reclusive ocialy, showing “learned” antisocial traits rather than core character traits. While there isn’t a huge number of accounts of Emilys early childhood, the ones that survive most notably from Cowen Bridge talks about her being seen as "a sweet little thing”. Miss Evans, the superintendent of the new school, called Brontë a “darling child” and “little petted Em” and the admissions register referred to her as “quite the pet nursling of the school.” Who doesn’t seem to have had trouble adapting to a different routine and one that was extremely rigid and in almost all respects different to her home life. Nor at this time does she seem to be having any problems interacting with strangers. Autistic children show problems with change and social interactions quite quickly. The negative responses to change and social environments is progressive but variable. It seems that as she gets older she gets less able to or willing to adjust.
Read more on: Hathaways of Haworth
Indeed didn't people say she was bi-polar when that was the popular mental difficulty years ago?
BeantwoordenVerwijderenWhatever is new is applied to the Brontes
It seems that as she gets older she gets less able to or willing to adjust.
That's called being cranky . She saw no reason to invest time or thought in the "how are you?" level of social discourse. It was to her insipid, mind numbing and distracted from her vastly more important inner life. CB wanted to take on the social part of this upper world of ours...Emily saw no reason to. I can't say she was wrong lol. Society's ego is such, that if one doesn't want to engage with it, it's felt there must be something wrong with you ...perhaps not